Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
acessibilidade
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/6231
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vieira, João Vítor | - |
dc.contributor.author | Deodato, Sérgio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mendes, Felismina Rosa Parreira | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-07T15:14:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-07T15:14:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-26 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vieira, J., Deodato, S., & Mendes, F. (2021). The concept of futility in health: A scoping review. Clinical Ethics, 16(4), 347–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750920977109 | por |
dc.identifier.issn | 1758-101X | - |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85096855818 | - |
dc.identifier.other | cv-prod-2100677 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/6231 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction:Duetotheconstant scientificandtechnological development, healthprofessionalsareregularlyconfrontedwithsituations inwhichtherearealways therapeuticoptions, regardlessof theseverityof thepatient’scondition.However, regardingthesetherapeuticoptionsas feasible inall situationscanbeharmful, since it isuniversally acceptedthat,despitealladvancesinhealth,thereareinevitablelimitsandthepromotionofsomeinterventionsmaybe uselessor futile. Objective:Tocharacterizetheuseof theconceptof futility inthehealthliterature. Method:ReviewoftheliteraturefollowingtheScopingReviewprotocoloftheJoannaBriggsInstitute.Theresearchwas performed inCINAHL,Cochrane, Pubmed, Scopus eWebof Science to identify studies publishedprior to2020. Nineteenstudieswereselected. Results:There isnouniversallyaccepteddefinition for theconceptof futility. Inthe literature therearedifferent conceptionsfortheconceptoffutilitythatpointtoqualitativeandquantitativerootsandthatareassociatedwithethical dilemmasthatmakeitdifficult toconceptualizethisconceptandmakeitoperational inclinicalpractice. Conclusion:Thecentralelementsoftheconceptof futilityinclude: thediagnosisof futilityiscloselyrelatedtoclinical judgment; futilityhasbothquantitativeandqualitativeroots; futilityisalwaysappreciatedposteriori; futilityisrelatedto thelackofbenefit. It isessential topromoteadiscussionthatenablesthedefinitionof theconceptandthatmakes it possibletopromoteethicalprinciples incare,especiallywhentheinevitablelimitsof treatmentsarereached. | por |
dc.language.iso | eng | por |
dc.publisher | Sage | por |
dc.rights | closedAccess | por |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | por |
dc.subject | Bioethics | por |
dc.subject | Clinical ethics | por |
dc.subject | Ethics | por |
dc.subject | Medical futility | por |
dc.subject | Professional ethics | por |
dc.title | The concept of futility in health: A scoping review | por |
dc.type | article | por |
dc.date.updated | 2023-05-25T10:16:42Z | - |
dc.identifier.slug | cv-prod-2100677 | - |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | por |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/clinical-ethics | por |
degois.publication.firstPage | 347 | por |
degois.publication.lastPage | 353 | por |
degois.publication.title | Clinical Ethics | por |
degois.publication.volume | 16(4) | por |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750920977109 | por |
Appears in Collections: | D-SA - Artigos em revistas indexadas à WoS/Scopus |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FutilityConcept-CLINICALETHICS.pdf | 646.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License