Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4991
Full metadata record
wcag
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBilau, José-
dc.contributor.authorMason, Colin-
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, Tiago-
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Soumodip-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T13:30:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-30T13:30:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-23-
dc.identifier.citationBilau J., Mason C., Botelho T. & Sarkar S. (2017). Angel investing in an austerity economy: the take-up of government policies in Portugal, European Planning Studies, 25:9, 1516-1537, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1328045por
dc.identifier.issn1469-5944-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4991-
dc.description.abstractBusiness angels (BAs) are recognized as playing a significant role in stimulating entrepreneurial activity. With the decline in both bank lending and venture capital investment since the onset of the global economic crisis, government efforts to stimulate BA activity have become a more significant component in strategies to increase the level of entrepreneurial activity. This paper examines the responsiveness of angels to such initiatives in so-called austerity economies – countries that were hardest hit by the financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent global recession and, as a consequence, had to take extreme economic and fiscal measures to reduce their budget deficits. We examine this question in Portugal which experienced one of the deepest recessions in the European Union following the implementation of severe austerity measures. This study confirms that government intervention to support angel investing can have a positive impact. However, the different types of intervention have varied in take-up rates. Other countries can learn from the Portuguese experience in three ways: the types of interventions that have the highest and lowest levels of take-up, the link between the design and the take-up of incentives, and types of intervention that should be considered but have not been implemented in Portugal.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherRoutlegepor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/por
dc.subjectAusteritypor
dc.subjectEntrepreneurshippor
dc.subjectEntrepreneurial financepor
dc.subjectBusiness angelspor
dc.subjectgovernment policypor
dc.subjectIndexação Scopuspor
dc.subjectindexação Web of Sciencepor
dc.titleAngel investing in an austerity economy: the take-up of government policies in Portugalpor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1328045por
degois.publication.firstPage1516por
degois.publication.issue25por
degois.publication.lastPage1537por
degois.publication.titleEuropean Planning Studiespor
degois.publication.volume9por
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1328045por
Appears in Collections:D-CE - Artigos em revistas com peer review

Files in This Item:
wcag
File Description SizeFormat 
EPS final Jose Bilau et al,.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons