Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5615
Full metadata record
wcag
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, S. A.-
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, P.-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, D.-
dc.contributor.authorFidalgo, Liliana G-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Mauro D-
dc.contributor.authorQueirós, R. P.-
dc.contributor.authorDelgadillo, I.-
dc.contributor.authorSaraiva, J. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T11:14:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-25T11:14:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.citationMoreira, S., Fernandes, P., Duarte, R., Santos, D., Fidalgo, L., Santos, M., Queirós, R., Delgadillo, I. & Saraiva, J. (2015). A first study comparing preservation of a ready-to-eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration. Food Science and Nutrition, 3(6), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212|por
dc.identifier.issn2048-7177-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5615-
dc.description.abstractHyperbaric storage (HS), storage under pressure at 25°C and 30°C, of a ready-to-eat (RTE) soup was studied and compared with refrigeration. Soup was stored at different time (4 and 8 h), temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 30°C), and pressure (0.1, 100, and 150 MPa) conditions, to compare microbial loads and physicochemical parameters. HS resulted in similar (microbial growth inhibition) to better (microbial inactivation) results compared to refrigeration, leading to equal and lower microbial loads, respectively, at the end of storage. Lower/higher pressure (100 vs. 150 MPa) and shorter/longer storage times (4 vs. 8 h) resulted in more pronounced microbial growth inhibition/microbial inactivation. Aerobic mesophiles showed less susceptibility to HS, compared to Enterobacteriaceae and yeast and molds. HS maintained generally the physicochemical parameters at values similar to refrigeration. Thus, HS with no need for temperature control throughout storage and so basically energetically costless, is a potential alternative to refrigeration.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherWileypor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/por
dc.subjectFood preservationpor
dc.subjectHigh pressurepor
dc.subjectHyperbaric storagepor
dc.subjectMicrobial loadspor
dc.subjectRefrigerationpor
dc.subjectSouppor
dc.titleA first study comparing preservation of a ready-to-eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigerationpor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/20487177por
degois.publication.firstPage467por
degois.publication.lastPage474por
degois.publication.titleFood Science and Nutritionpor
degois.publication.volume3(6)por
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212|por
Appears in Collections:D-TCA - Artigos em revistas indexadas à WoS/Scopus

Files in This Item:
wcag
File Description SizeFormat 
A first study comparing preservation of a ready-to-eat soup_PDFA.pdf401.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons