Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5007
Full metadata record
wcag
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarta, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Ana R-
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Pedro T-
dc.contributor.authorCasanova, Natalina-
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Henrique P-
dc.contributor.authorAguado-Jimenez, Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Martínez, Alicia M-
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo, Mikel-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Mário C-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T20:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-30T20:05:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5007-
dc.descriptionThis work is supported by national funding through the Portuguese Foun- dation for Science and Technology, I.P., under project UID/DTP/04045/2019 and the European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER) allocated by European Union through the COMPETE 2020 Programme (POCI-01- 0145-FEDER-006969) Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI).por
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of an 8-week program of resistance training (RT) or suspension training (ST) on explosive strength in prepubescent boys. Methods: Fifty-seven boys aged 10–11 years were assigned to 2 training groups, RT or ST or a control group (no training program). Boys trained twice weekly for 8 weeks. Results: A significant interaction was reported with a large (P < .001, η2p = .463), medium (P < .001, η2p = .395), and small effect sized (P ≤ .001, η2p = .218) in the 1-kg ball throw, 3-kg ball throw, and time-at-20-m test, respectively. There was no significant interaction in the countermovement vertical jump or the standing long jump. Changes from preintervention to postintervention for the 1-kg ball throw were 5.94% and 5.82% for the ST and RT, respectively, and 8.82% and 8.14% in the 3-kg ball throw for the ST and RT, respectively. The improvement in the 20-m sprint was 1.19% for the ST and 2.33% for the RT. Conclusion: Traditional RT and ST seem to be effective methods for improving explosive strength in prepubescent boys. ST could be considered as an alternative modality to optimize explosive strength training in school-based programs.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FDTP%2F04045%2F2019/PTpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/por
dc.subjectschool-based programspor
dc.subjectphysical fitnesspor
dc.subjectpowerpor
dc.subjectunstablepor
dc.subjectyouthpor
dc.subjectIndexação Scopuspor
dc.titleEffects of suspension versus traditional resistance training on explosive strength in elementary school-aged boyspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1123/pes.2018-0287por
degois.publication.firstPage473por
degois.publication.lastPage479por
degois.publication.titlePediatric Exercise Sciencepor
degois.publication.volume31(4)por
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/pes.2018-0287por
Appears in Collections:D-AHD - Artigos em revistas com peer review

Files in This Item:
wcag
File Description SizeFormat 
PES.2018-0287_AUTHOR_1.pdf796.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons