Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5005
Full metadata record
wcag
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Ana R-
dc.contributor.authorMarta, Carlos C-
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Henrique P-
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo, Mikel-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Mário C-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T19:48:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-30T19:48:51Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/5005-
dc.description.abstractAlves, AR, Marta, C, Neiva, HP, Izquierdo, M, and Marques, MC. Does intrasession concurrent strength and aerobic training order influence training-induced explosive strength and V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in prepubescent children?. J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3267-3277, 2016-The aim of this study was to analyze the interference of strength and aerobic training order over an 8-week period on explosive skills and maximal oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) in prepubescent children. One hundred twenty-eight prepubescent children aged 10-11 years (10.9 ± 0.5 years) were randomly selected and assigned to 1 of the 3 groups: intrasession concurrent aerobic before (GAS: n = 39) or after strength training (GSA: n = 45) or control group (GC: n = 44; no training program). The GC maintained their baseline level performance, and training-induced differences were found in the experimental groups. Increases were found in the 1-kg and 3-kg medicine ball throws: GAS: +3%, +5.5%, p ≤ 0.05, p < 0.001; GSA: +5.7%, +8.7%, p < 0.001, respectively; in the counter movement jump height and standing long jump length: GAS: +6.5%, +3.4%, p ≤ 0.05; GSA: +7%, +4.5%, p < 0.001, respectively; in the 20-m shuttle-run time: GAS: +2.3%; GSA: +4.6%, p < 0.001; and, in the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max: GAS: +7.3%, p < 0.001; GSA: +3.8%, p < 0.001 from pretraining to post-training. All programs were effective, but GSA produced better results than GAS for muscle strength variables, and GAS produced better results than GSA for aerobic capacity variables. The present study explored an unknown issue and added useful information to the literature in this area. These training methods should be taken into consideration to optimize explosive strength and cardiorespiratory fitness training in school-based programs and sports club programs.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/por
dc.subjectyouthpor
dc.subjectpowerpor
dc.subjectcardiorespiratorypor
dc.subjectmuscular conditioningpor
dc.titleDoes intrasession concurrent strength and aerobic training order influence training-induced explosive strength and V [Combining Dot Above] O2max in prepubescent children?por
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001431por
degois.publication.firstPage3267por
degois.publication.lastPage3277por
degois.publication.titleThe Journal of Strength and Conditioning Researchpor
degois.publication.volume30(12)por
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000001431por
Appears in Collections:D-AHD - Artigos em revistas com peer review

Files in This Item:
wcag
File Description SizeFormat 
Alves et al.2016.pdf369.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons