Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4791
Full metadata record
wcag
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Bárbara-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Maria João-
dc.contributor.authorFerro Palma, Silvina-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-18T15:33:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-18T15:33:04Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.issn1885-4494-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4791-
dc.description.abstractThis study aim is to evaluate the characteristics of both types of pig loins from Alentejano and White pigs, manufactured with distinguish processes, taking in account that smoked technology is most appreciated in Portugal, than in the other European countries, whom preferences stands in cured products by drying technology. In the study, 6 Alentejano pigs, crossbred at 50% with Duroc and reared in free-range system, classified as class 2 by decree-law nº95/2014, and 6 crossbreed White pigs, reared in intensive system were used, weighting 120 kg and 100 kg, respectively, after slaughtering. The loins processing was in “Salsicharia Estremocense Lda”. The evaluation between Alentejano breed and White crossbreed loins, smoked and dry-cured, were made physical and chemical analysis (pH, aW, WHC, moisture content, ash, fat, protein, TBARS, TVB-N) and sensory analysis (QDA).No significant differences were showed in pH, moisture and WHC in the loins processed by the two technologies, as well as in the nutritional value. Lipid profile also had not shown significant differences, nor even due to the breed neither to the technology, however it should be highlighted that the Alentejano loins had an amount of 13% fat while the Exotic loins had shown 8% fat content. The TVB-N content was higher in Alentejano loins, for both technologies, and TBARS varies along the processing, however this parameter didn’t distinguish the different technologies.There were significant differences between the breeds and the technologies in sensory color and bitter taste. The sensory analysis heightens, in the two breeds, the smoked technology, and thus the panellists overall acceptability.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cordoba, Servicio de Publicacionespor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/por
dc.subjectSensory analysispor
dc.subjectFatty acidpor
dc.subjectTBARSpor
dc.subjectNPNpor
dc.subjectIndexação Scopuapor
dc.titleSmoked vs dry-cured alentejano and white pig loinspor
dc.title.alternativeLomos de cerdo Alentejano y blanco ahumados vs curadospor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.21071/az.v67iSupplementpor
degois.publication.firstPage221por
degois.publication.lastPage225por
degois.publication.titleArchivos de zootecniapor
degois.publication.volumeAÑO 2018, SUPPLEMENTO 1 PROCEEDINGS IX SIMPOSIO DEL CERDO DEL MEDITERRÁNEOpor
dc.identifier.doi10.21071/az.v67iSupplement.3243por
Appears in Collections:D-TCA - Artigos em revistas com peer review

Files in This Item:
wcag
File Description SizeFormat 
Smoked vs Dry-cured Alentejano and white pig loins.pdf963.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons